Hi,
I would like to get your thoughts on my profile and if I need to take the GMAT again.
I took it last weekend and got a 710 (Q44, V42).  I was very happy with the 710 as I was shooting for a 700.  The only problem is my Quant score is in the 66th percentile.  I was very happy with a verbal score in the 95 percentile, and I am not sure if I could do that again.  
I am applying to Stanford, Harvard, Wharton, Kellogg, and Booth.  It seems like those schools want to see a higher Quant score.  
My college major was Econ and I had a 3.42 GPA at UCLA.  In addition I earned the CFP designation which was a 2 day 10 hour exam for financial planners.  I also passed the series 7 exam, which was pretty easy compared to the CFP.  So I do have a lot of Quant in my background.  
My leadership experience includes being the CFO of my homeowner's association, I was president of my fraternity in college, and I was co-president of the HBS partner's club when my wife went to school there.  
For community service I volunteer for the Wounded Warrior program and provide pro-bono financial planning to military families.  
I am not trying to lead with my GMAT score, but rather I don't want it to hurt me.  I am worried that some schools that are more quant focused will view my quant score as a negative.  Should I address that in one of my essays?  I just want to make sure I get an honest look from the schools I am applying to.
My reason for applying to b-school now is I see a big need for comprehensive financial planning for the "average investor."  I am not satisfied with the current financial planning models that are out there (Merrill Lynch, Northwestern Mutual, Edward Jones, etc.).  I want to create a new business model that will enable me to effect change for a larger number of people.  I envision leveraging technology in a way that would allow me to serve more clients.  Stanford would be an ideal place to go since they are right next to Silicon Valley.
Thanks in advance!
							