RA Wrote:Total outcomes = (Possible outcomes for the first flip) X (Possible outcomes for the second flip) X (Possible outcomes for the third slip)
Now we know each flip has 2 possible outcomes, therefore total outcomes = 2 X 2 X 2 = 8
Hope that helps.
heh heh, 'slip'. cute.
the above is totally correct.
as for why you can't use the anagram model - you're not finding
rearrangements of anything. if you had 3 different coins (say, nickel, dime, quarter) and you were deciding in which order to insert them into a vending machine, then
that would be an "anagram model" situation, because you're actually finding the number of different
orderings of the three coins.
in this problem, on the other hand, you're not finding the number of orderings of a set of 3 distinct items, so the anagram method doesn't apply. instead, because you're combining the outcomes of
different steps of a process (1st flip, 2nd flip, 3rd flip) to find aggregate outcomes, you use consecutive multiplication.
--
to the other poster: it's quite possible for the anagram method to be used in a probability problem, actually. if your set of "total outcomes" or your set of "successes" can be counted by rearranging items, then you can use the anagram method for that;
remember that the numerator and denominator in probability problems,
individually, are the result of counting. since combinatorics is the mathematics of counting, it's no surprise that combinatorial methods can apply.