Dear instructors,
I have a question about a problem I saw in the advanced quant book:
Try it #4-10
Is a < 0?
(1) a^3 < a^2 + 2a
(2) a^2 > a^3
The book takes us through a long explanation and (helpful) method of testing numbers. However, when testing 0, the book says it is invalid for both statements. When testing 0, statement 1 yields:
0^3 < 0^2 + 2(0)
which is false because 0 < 0 is false, and statement 2 yields
0^2 > 0^3
which is also false for the same reason.
If I were approaching this problem, I would assume the answer is E because if a = 0, the statements are equal, and there must be other values for which each statement holds true. Is this not a valid approach? I thought it was until I saw in the advanced quant book that testing 0 is listed as "invalid," which doesn't make sense to me. Is 0 also an invalid plug-in for other inequality problems? Can someone please explain this to me?
Thanks a lot for your help :)