sbrara Wrote:We are given the height (60/13) because the area is 30. Can't we draw a line down from angle ABC perpendicular to AC, which gives us a 90 degree triangle. from there we have two sides, 5 and 60/13. can't we use the Pythagorean Theorem to determine what A to the intersection is. From that we can determine what the intersection to C is, which is 13 - (A to intersection distance). Now we have 2 angles again for a right triangle, from that we can use the Pythagorean theorem to determine the hypotenuse of Triangle ABC.
Please explain how we cannot do that??
I know this one well, because I answered D, too, when I first did this under timed conditions. It's not that you can't do that--that's exactly the right math. It's just that you've overlooked a completely different possible scenario.
When you say that the height must be 60/13, that uses side AC with length 13 as the base. But you are making an assumption: that the height (drawn perpendicular from the base, to the opposite corner B) is drawn within the triangle. The height can also be measured outside the triangle: imagine the apex at point B "leaning" to the left of base AC, rather than hovering somewhere above it. In such a case, the height is drawn perpendicular to an extension of AC up to B, outside the triangle. (There's a picture of both scenarios in the explanation.)
For either scenario, you'd use Pythagorean theorem as you describe.
For the height-inside-the-triangle scenario, you'd add a point D on AC such that BD is the height (i.e. BD is perpendicular to AC). Using BD = 60/13 (given by the area), by Pythagorean theorem, AD = 25/13, DC = 144/13, so BC = 12.
For the height-outside-the-triangle scenario, you'd add a point D on the extension of AC, to the left of A. By the same Pythagorean logic, AD would be 25/13. The next right triangle would be BCD, with the right angle at D. By Pythagorean theorem again: BC = squareroot[(60/13)^2 +(13+25/13)^2] = about 15.6.