Questions about the world of GMAT Math from other sources and general math related questions.
coolfire_khan
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 12:41 pm
 

inequality

by coolfire_khan Fri Jul 10, 2009 11:57 am

Hi,

I just wanted to make sure that can we cross multiply inequalities?

for eg if i have this question

1/p> r/(r^2+2)

can we rephrase it like this

r^2+2>pr

OR

if we have
(m+x)/(n+X)> m/n
so can we cross multiply this equality and reduce it to
n>m??

Please clearify..
cfaking
Students
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: India
 

Re: inequality

by cfaking Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:50 am

Yes, you are right
provided other conditions such as " x Not equal to Zero(in 2nd case) etc"..are met

pls Note

> changes to < only when you change the Sign on both sides

like
say if (-)x/y > (-) p/q
then the following is true
=>x/y < p/q
Many of the great achievements of the world were accomplished by tired and discouraged men who kept on working.
ankit.ankitagrawal
Students
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 9:10 pm
 

Re: inequality

by ankit.ankitagrawal Sat Jul 11, 2009 3:05 pm

cfaking Wrote:Yes, you are right
provided other conditions such as " x Not equal to Zero(in 2nd case) etc"..are met

pls Note

> changes to < only when you change the Sign on both sides

like
say if (-)x/y > (-) p/q
then the following is true
=>x/y < p/q


I would like to add my 2 cents on it.. We should not ever cross multiply inequalities is we are not sure about the sign of variables involved.. The reason behind this is if we multiply anything negative to both the sides the inequality is reversed.

Example:

2 < 3

Multilpying by 2 both sides we get

4 < 6 which is true

But, multiplying by -2 both sides we get

-4 < -6 which is false, so we should reverse the inequality as well when multiplying with negative. therefore after reversing the inequality we get -4 > -6 which is true..

HTH!!!
coolfire_khan
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 12:41 pm
 

Re: inequality

by coolfire_khan Sat Jul 11, 2009 9:25 pm

ankit.ankitagrawal Wrote:
cfaking Wrote:Yes, you are right
provided other conditions such as " x Not equal to Zero(in 2nd case) etc"..are met

pls Note

> changes to < only when you change the Sign on both sides

like
say if (-)x/y > (-) p/q
then the following is true
=>x/y < p/q


I would like to add my 2 cents on it.. We should not ever cross multiply inequalities is we are not sure about the sign of variables involved.. The reason behind this is if we multiply anything negative to both the sides the inequality is reversed.

Example:

2 < 3

Multilpying by 2 both sides we get

4 < 6 which is true

But, multiplying by -2 both sides we get

-4 < -6 which is false, so we should reverse the inequality as well when multiplying with negative. therefore after reversing the inequality we get -4 > -6 which is true..

HTH!!!



Thanks both of you...:)
cfaking
Students
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: India
 

Re: inequality

by cfaking Sun Jul 12, 2009 3:30 am

agreed
thats why we shd not cross multiply in the case

1/p> r/(r^2+2)

becoz p could be +ve or -ve
we never know
Many of the great achievements of the world were accomplished by tired and discouraged men who kept on working.
Ben Ku
ManhattanGMAT Staff
 
Posts: 817
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 7:49 pm
 

Re: inequality

by Ben Ku Thu Aug 13, 2009 6:07 pm

There are a lot of good replies on this one. Just remember that "cross multiplication" is a name we give for multiplying both sides by the denominator of a proportion (two fractions that are equal to each other). In an inequality, however, we cannot multiply variables if we do not know their sign. This is a common trap for test-takers.
Ben Ku
Instructor
ManhattanGMAT