shyamprasadrao Wrote:Dividing by zero is same as multiplying by zero
whoa, no. this is not true.
notice that your argument seems to work for any number "a". this is troubling, because, according to this "argument", dividing by ANY number "a" is the same as multiplying by "a".
this is definitely not true. for instance, dividing by 2 is clearly not the same thing as multiplying by 2.
what your argument DOES show is something that is already well known: namely, that, IF "A" IS NONZERO,
* you can multiply both sides of an equation by "a", OR
* you can divide both sides of an equation by "a".
these facts are well known, but it never hurts to reiterate them.
Lets look at an example,
X and Y are integers
a * X = a * Y this can be rewritten as
X /a = Y /a I am just cross multiplying.
"cross multiply" is not a real operation.
(also, technically, you aren't "cross multiplying" here anyway; you're actually UNDOING "cross multiplication".)
to get from the first to the second of these, you're actually DIVIDING by a^2.
if a = 0, then that's a problem, since division by 0 is not allowed, ever.
--
here's the original:
In multiplication it doesn't matter, right? We can go ahead and multiply by the variable even if we don't know whether the variable equals zero or not, correct?
correct.
this is only true for EQUATIONS, though.
if you have an INEQUALITY, you can't multiply by a variable unless you know whether it is positive or negative.
one side effect here is that you shouldn't multiply INEQUALITIES, especially those containing "<" or ">", by something that could be 0.