Verbal problems from the *free* official practice tests and
problems from mba.com
Chelsey Cooley
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 107
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2014 10:49 am
 

Re: SC A one million-year-old skull

by Chelsey Cooley Sat Oct 31, 2015 8:57 pm

I'm not sure I understand your argument - could you give some more detail? There are a number of clear grammatical reasons not to pick A, so you shouldn't have to go to nuances of meaning while doing the problem. But we can talk about them here if you're more specific :)
anveshr735
Students
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 5:23 pm
 

Re: SC A one million-year-old skull

by anveshr735 Thu Nov 05, 2015 3:26 am

Chelsey Cooley Wrote:I'm not sure I understand your argument - could you give some more detail? There are a number of clear grammatical reasons not to pick A, so you shouldn't have to go to nuances of meaning while doing the problem. But we can talk about them here if you're more specific :)


A one million-year-old skull bearing traits associated both with Homo erectus and, in addition, Homo sapiens has been found in the Afar region of Eritrea, and indicates that modern humans developed much earlier than previously thought.

I thought the sentence meant, A one million year old skull has been found in Afar and 1M old skull indicates that modern humans developed much earlier.
Had the sentence be framed:
A one million-year-old skull bearing traits associated both with Homo erectus and Homo sapiens has been found in the Afar region of Eritrea and indicates that modern humans developed much earlier than previously thought.
OR
A one million-year-old skull bearing traits associated both with Homo erectus and, in addition, Homo sapiens has been found in the Afar region of Eritrea, and it indicates that modern humans developed much earlier than previously thought.

Do they match my line of thinking?

Regards
Anvesh
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: SC A one million-year-old skull

by RonPurewal Thu Nov 05, 2015 7:26 am

anveshr735 Wrote:Had the sentence be framed:


i don't know what this ^^ means.
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: SC A one million-year-old skull

by RonPurewal Thu Nov 05, 2015 7:27 am

regardless, the use of 'and' to connect these ideas is nonsense, for reasons explained here:
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/foru ... ml#p115627
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: SC A one million-year-old skull

by RonPurewal Thu Nov 05, 2015 7:28 am

on the other hand, 'comma + __ing' (as used in the correct answer) is precisely appropriate:
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/foru ... ml#p118480
anveshr735
Students
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 5:23 pm
 

Re: SC A one million-year-old skull

by anveshr735 Thu Nov 05, 2015 1:56 pm

RonPurewal Wrote:regardless, the use of 'and' to connect these ideas is nonsense, for reasons explained here:
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/foru ... ml#p115627


Thank you..it was helpful:)
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: SC A one million-year-old skull

by RonPurewal Thu Nov 12, 2015 4:21 am

you're welcome.