Math questions from any Manhattan Prep GMAT Computer Adaptive Test.
vicslick46
Students
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 4:17 pm
 

THE ROOT OF THE ROOTS

by vicslick46 Thu Nov 12, 2009 6:55 pm

Hi, this was the explanation given for the problem CAT problem (simplifying the equation), I see how cube root 80 turns into cube root 16*5, but how does it go from that, to 12*root 5?


√(█(∛ 80 + 3/(9+4√ 5) ((9-4√ 5))/(9-4√ 5))
=

√(█(∛(16*5)+(27-12√5)/(81-(16*5))
=

√(12√5+27-12√5)

=

√27
helloriteshranjan
Students
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 12:40 am
 

Re: THE ROOT OF THE ROOTS

by helloriteshranjan Fri Nov 13, 2009 4:12 pm

fishy step...!!
I mean wrong.

where does this problem appear?
Ben Ku
ManhattanGMAT Staff
 
Posts: 817
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 7:49 pm
 

Re: THE ROOT OF THE ROOTS

by Ben Ku Wed Jan 13, 2010 1:10 am

Hi, this was the explanation given for the problem CAT problem (simplifying the equation), I see how cube root 80 turns into cube root 16*5, but how does it go from that, to 12*root 5?


3√ 80 is not the cube root of 80. instead it's 3 * √ 80.

3 * √ 80
= 3 * √ (16*5)
= 3 * 4 * √ 5
= 12 * √ 5

Hope that helps.
Ben Ku
Instructor
ManhattanGMAT
sadat.sathak
Students
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 5:41 am
 

Re: THE ROOT OF THE ROOTS

by sadat.sathak Thu Oct 13, 2011 2:43 pm

The denominator of the second part under the root --> "81-(16)(5)" Seems to have dissapeared from the 2nd step onwards. What gives?
jnelson0612
ManhattanGMAT Staff
 
Posts: 2664
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 10:57 am
 

Re: THE ROOT OF THE ROOTS

by jnelson0612 Sun Nov 20, 2011 12:30 am

sadat.sathak Wrote:The denominator of the second part under the root --> "81-(16)(5)" Seems to have dissapeared from the 2nd step onwards. What gives?


When you solve that part out, you get 81 - 80 = 1, so the denominator of 1 can be safely removed from the equation. :-)

Best wishes,
Jamie Nelson
ManhattanGMAT Instructor
hidden
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:36 am
 

Re: THE ROOT OF THE ROOTS

by hidden Sat Nov 17, 2012 5:29 pm

Following up on this question, what does it mean when the explanation says "To eliminate a radical in the denominator, we can multiply both the numerator and the denominator by the conjugate of that denominator"? Could someone perhaps refer me to the page in the MGMAT text which teaches this? I'm very confused about the rule, and how we eliminate that denominator. Thank you!
jnelson0612
ManhattanGMAT Staff
 
Posts: 2664
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 10:57 am
 

Re: THE ROOT OF THE ROOTS

by jnelson0612 Sun Nov 18, 2012 12:04 am

hidden Wrote:Following up on this question, what does it mean when the explanation says "To eliminate a radical in the denominator, we can multiply both the numerator and the denominator by the conjugate of that denominator"? Could someone perhaps refer me to the page in the MGMAT text which teaches this? I'm very confused about the rule, and how we eliminate that denominator. Thank you!


Sure!
Take a look at Ben's post in this thread: fractions-simplifying-fractions-t7821.html He is showing how to multiply by the conjugate to get rid of the square root in the denominator of this problem. Remember, it's not okay to leave square roots in denominators. We have to get rid of them, so we multiply by the conjugate on the top and bottom of the fraction, since it's perfectly okay to have square roots in numerators.

Let us know if we can help you further!
Jamie Nelson
ManhattanGMAT Instructor
hidden
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:36 am
 

Re: THE ROOT OF THE ROOTS

by hidden Sun Nov 18, 2012 11:07 am

Perfect thanks! My flashcard collection is getting so big...

:) At least I'm learning!
tim
Course Students
 
Posts: 5665
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:08 am
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
 

Re: THE ROOT OF THE ROOTS

by tim Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:10 pm

glad to hear it!
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor

Follow this link for some important tips to get the most out of your forum experience:
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/a-few-tips-t31405.html