1) V=74. If I know this is an isosceles triangle: and V=74, therefore U will also equal 74.
U+V=148
Next, Solve for W
W=180-148=32
W=32
180-V=106
From what I know of triangles, they equal 180 degrees.
180-V=Z
Z=106
X+Y+Z=180
X+Y+106=180 (Plug in for Z below)
-106 -106 Subtract Z from both sides.
X+Y =74
This is sufficient to solve the problem.
Everything in green is irrelevant. Waste of time.
If you have v, you can just find z, from which you can find x + y as described. Why bother with the right-hand triangle?
Remember,
FOCUS on a GOAL is the
primary thing tested on data sufficiency problems. You don't want to wander all around the diagram finding irrelevant information. You want to identify
what you actually NEED to find, and then find things with that specific goal in mind.
In other words, I have a feeling you'd have gotten this part wrong if they hadn't told you that the right-hand triangle is isosceles.
Even if there's no information about the right-hand triangle at all, this statement is still sufficient.For Statement 2) W=32, so 180-32=148, 148/2=74,
continue to X+Y+Z=180
Known's
V=74
Solve for Z. 180-V=106
Z=106
X+Y+Z=180
-106 =-106 substitute/subtract for Z
X+Y = 74
Works.