Clarification on LR Strategy Guide Inference Ex Q

[MikaylaA752]

On page 481 of LR Strategy Guide - I was confused by the explanation of the incorrect answers and why (based on the previous reasoning) E was correct. If A-D are wrong because we don't know about all people - only those who are on the planning committee- why is E more provable?

Couldn't some persons with signification financial interests in the PC decisions live in the suburbs? I know the PC does not live in suburbs but what about people who aren't in PC? We don't know about them but there could be people living in the suburbs who are interested. C) was incorrect because "Some persons with significant financial interests in the planning committees' decisions work in the suburbs" - so isn't that saying Some people work in the suburbs - i.e. are clearly not on Planning Committee

[ohthatpatrick]

Hi, check out the thread on that question and then add a follow up question on that thread if you're still feeling iffy on it.
https://www.manhattanprep.com/lsat/foru ... t1607.html