it sounds like the first rule eliminates S from interviewing last. R can also not interview first or last, meaning T must interview the last candidate. Since R can also not interview first or second, because R cannot interview candidate I, who is going second, it would seem R should be required to interview 3rd and 5th, meaning S must interview 4th. but this must be wrong, because the second question asks about T interviewing third, which is impossible based on my conclusion. what am I missing here?
Thanks
Sam