NoraS176
Thanks Received: 0
Vinny Gambini
Vinny Gambini
 
Posts: 1
Joined: October 22nd, 2018
 
 
 

Match the Reasoning Conditional Logic

by NoraS176 Wed Jan 16, 2019 3:49 pm

I had a questions about some conditional logic phrasing that I can't wrap my head around. This type of logic appeared in as an answer choice in a match the reasoning question about archaeology or ancient civilization, something like that:

taking the nonexistence of something as evidence that a necessary precondition for that thing also did not exist

Abstract:
y is a necessary precondition for x.......x requires y....... x therefore y
Answer says: ~ x therefore ~ y
Illegal negation

Alternate Example:
Spanish 1 is a necessary precondition for Spanish 2..... Span2 requires Span1... Span 2 therefore Span 1.
Saying "Spanish 2 does not exist on Shelia's transcript, so I'm going to treat that as evidence that Spanish 1 also does not appear on her transcript" doesn't make sense at all. Invalid argument due to illegal negation.

I think the term "necessary precondition" is tripping me up. Am I thinking about the conditional logic correct?
User avatar
 
ohthatpatrick
Thanks Received: 3808
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 4661
Joined: April 01st, 2011
 
 
 

Re: Match the Reasoning Conditional Logic

by ohthatpatrick Wed Jan 16, 2019 4:11 pm

It sounds like you're totally nailing it. Those are perfect examples.

A necessary precondition is just a fancy way of saying "a necessary condition".

I think the term 'precondition' is just conveying an additional temporal dimension of "it's not only necessary, it would have occurred earlier".

I kinda think of all Necessary conditions as earlier, as preconditions, but you could probably think of a simultaneous one.

"In order for Nora to date someone, they must have a cool hairstyle."

That requirement doesn't necessarily need to predate you dating someone (unfortunate pun there). It would be okay if their hairstyle sucked prior to dating you.
 
mmegak152
Thanks Received: 0
Vinny Gambini
Vinny Gambini
 
Posts: 1
Joined: July 22nd, 2024
 
 
 

Re: Match the Reasoning Conditional Logic

by mmegak152 Mon Jul 29, 2024 3:20 am

ohthatpatrick Wrote:It sounds like you're totally nailing it. Those are perfect examples.

A necessary precondition is just a fancy way of saying "a necessary condition".

I think the term 'precondition' is just conveying an additional temporal dimension of "it's not only necessary, it would have occurred earlier".

I kinda think of all Necessary conditions as earlier, as preconditions, but you could probably think of a simultaneous one.

"In order for Nora to date someone, they must have a cool hairstyle."

That requirement doesn't necessarily need to predate you dating someone (unfortunate pun there). It would be okay if their hairstyle sucked prior to dating you.



I got this,...