Question Type:
Explain Discrepancy
Stimulus Breakdown:
Fact 1: Brush after every meal to get rid of sugars (which lead to bact -> acid -> cavities)
Fact 2: When you can't brush, chew gum, even if the gum has sugar, to help avert cavities.
Answer Anticipation:
GIVEN THAT the dentist wants us to get rid of sugars because sugars can lead ultimately to cavities,
WHY IS SHE SAYING THAT chewing gum w/ sugar in it could help prevent the formation of cavities? Presumably, whatever cavity protection we gain by chewing gum outweighs whatever increase in cavity formation is caused by the minimal sugar in the gum.
Correct Answer:
C
Answer Choice Analysis:
(A) This could almost work. Since gum has so little sugar, the impact that sugar would have on cavity formation is probably negligible. However, we still don't have any reason for why the dentist is recommending a small amount of sugar.
(B) This doesn't tell us why sugar is bad in one case but okay in another. And it tells us nothing about the virtue of gum.
(C) This tells us why chewing gum is good, but why is the sugar okay? Well, it helps that the way in which chewing gum is good is specifically undoing the way in which sugar was bad. Sugar was potentially giving us more bacteria, which gives us more acid, de-mineralizing enamel, and thus leading to cavities. Since gum apparently has the effect of reducing acid and remineralizing enamel, we can tell that (despite having sugar), it's a net gain.
(D) But why chew gum?
(E) Because this doesn't combat the negative effects of sugar, this answer doesn't help us understand how the dentist is at peace with sugared-gum.
Takeaway/Pattern: I think (A) is a tricky answer, because I'd like to know why "gum is good" and why "sugar in gum isn't bad". (A) seems to give the latter. (C) seems to give the former. How do we pick? Ultimately, (C) gives us the latter as well because the positive effects of gum outweigh the negative effects of sugar.
#officialexplanation