On lines 52-55 it states, "... he nevertheless ends his book by asking what changes in structures and consciousness might make political life more democratic in present polyarchies." Also, in paragraph 2, it is defending polyarchy. Is it because there are 2 contrasting paragraphs, one defending it and the other criticizing it, that it is a discussion of the strengths and weaknesses? I thought it was more about the strengths. Is A too specific?
Thanks!
