by ohthatpatrick Tue Sep 20, 2011 2:36 am
You made a good case for (E), but we can make a better case for (C).
We're trying to find an analogy for this story:
cakewalk became more popular with Europeans because it included European features (as you said, "high kicks, couples") ... but ironically Africans had added these features to make fun of Europeans (not to appeal to Europeans)
(C) matches up on several levels,
popular music lovers started liking something more
(cakewalk becomes more popular with Europeans)
because it included popular music features,
(high kicks, couples)
even though those features were added to make fun of popular music
(Africans had added those features to satirize Europeans)
(E) you could actually assign these two different ways, but neither works
if (popular = cakewalk, and traditional = European)
then ("after the cakewalk started using European styles, interest in EUROPEAN music increased"? That's backwards. We'd want to say that after the cakewalk started using European styles, interest in CAKEWALK increased)
if (popular = European, and traditional = cakewalk)
then ("after European music started using Cakewalk features, interest in Cakewalk increased". Here, the first half would be backwards.Cakewalk used more European stuff, not the other way around.
Also, (E) doesn't contain any part of the fact that the European features were put in there originally for the purpose of mocking European music.
Let me know if it doesn't makes sense why (C) would be a stronger match.