Question Type:
Match the Flaw
Stimulus Breakdown:
So far, no rain, which is less than average. So it'll probably rain soon.
Answer Anticipation:
This is a classic Gambler's Flaw, aka a Temporal Flaw. Just because something was true of the past/was a general trend doesn't mean it'll continue in the future. The correct answer will also try to conclude something will happen based on the trend/average of the past.
Correct answer:
(C)
Answer choice analysis:
(A) Premise/conclusion mismatch. The premise here is about what is "sometimes" true, not what the average is. Also, the conclusion states "may" instead of "probably". (This argument is also valid.)
(B) Tempting. I'd probably leave this on the first pass. However, the fact this answer flips around the argument to be about what won't happen is a strike against it.
(C) Bingo. Based on a prior average, a prediction is made about a current/future situation.
(D) Tempting! Like (B), this flips the argument around to be about what won't happen. It also doesn't establish an average; instead, it brings up what has happened in the recent editing sprint by Aisha.
(E) Tempting! However, the conclusion mismatches in calling Aisha's editing skills into question instead of predicting errors in future issues.
Takeaway/Pattern:
Gear up for a tough fight when Q18 is a Matching question. I would probably skip this question and come back to it!
#officialexplanation