Q22

 
MarisaP485
Thanks Received: 0
Vinny Gambini
Vinny Gambini
 
Posts: 3
Joined: October 13th, 2020
 
 
 

Q22

by MarisaP485 Sat Mar 20, 2021 6:43 pm

Hi there,
Can someone help me break down why C is wrong? In my 2nd pass through, I ultimately chose B (because I knew C was wrong). I initially chose C because it seemed PA spelled out the details and PB delved into, or examined, a case (lawsuits + Nonintercourse Act) that exemplifies a moral ideal. But I guess through an secondary analysis, C is wrong because PB doesn't exemplify a moral ideal?

OR -- is it the difference in wording for PA: spell out details vs sketch a general outline?

Sheesh, confusing myself. Let me know! :D
 
Misti Duvall
Thanks Received: 13
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 191
Joined: June 23rd, 2016
 
 
 

Re: Q22

by Misti Duvall Thu Mar 25, 2021 5:48 pm

MarisaP485 Wrote:Hi there,
Can someone help me break down why C is wrong? In my 2nd pass through, I ultimately chose B (because I knew C was wrong). I initially chose C because it seemed PA spelled out the details and PB delved into, or examined, a case (lawsuits + Nonintercourse Act) that exemplifies a moral ideal. But I guess through an secondary analysis, C is wrong because PB doesn't exemplify a moral ideal?

OR -- is it the difference in wording for PA: spell out details vs sketch a general outline?

Sheesh, confusing myself. Let me know! :D



Sure! I eliminated (C) based on "exemplifies a moral ideal," which I agree is not supported. And that's all you really need to eliminate it. I probably wouldn't focus too much on spell out details v sketch a general outline, especially if there's a more concrete way to eliminate (which the moral ideal language provides).

Hope this helps.
LSAT Instructor | Manhattan Prep