Can someone help me break down why C is wrong? In my 2nd pass through, I ultimately chose B (because I knew C was wrong). I initially chose C because it seemed PA spelled out the details and PB delved into, or examined, a case (lawsuits + Nonintercourse Act) that exemplifies a moral ideal. But I guess through an secondary analysis, C is wrong because PB doesn't exemplify a moral ideal?
OR -- is it the difference in wording for PA: spell out details vs sketch a general outline?
Sheesh, confusing myself. Let me know!
