by ohthatpatrick Tue Dec 19, 2017 2:00 pm
Exactly.
The first option gets the trigger right, but gets the consequence wrong. "F after P' would look, as you said, like P - F.
The second option, the correct answer choice, is just being tricky by writing the rule in contrapositive form.
If G is before H, F will be after P.
GIVEN:
G - H --> P - F
CONTRAPOSITIVE:
F - P --> H - G
When we write a contrapositive, we're saying, "If the 2nd side isn't happening, then the 1st side isn't happening".
If we're saying, "P before F isn't happening", then we're saying "F is before P.
Hope this helps.