I'm STILL confused with #4 and I think it might have to do with teh wording of the question. Here's my take on it:
J has to share with a girl, which means that J could be in whatever locker N or T is in (b/c r can't share a locker). If F is the third locker, then T or N can go in 1, 4; 1,5; 2, 4; 2,5; 1, 3; or 3, 5. However, if T or N is in 3, that means that J can't go in there with them since it'll be a locker with 3 people. Note that J MUST share a locker so it HAS to follow N or T unless N or T go in locker 3. If N and T can go in lockers 1, 2, 4, and 5, then so can J.
Which is why the answer of C) 3 is confusing b/c J can reasonably go in 4 different lockers. But if rachel is already placed, then J can only go in the lockers that N or T already have occupied, which leaves us with 2 different lockers that J can go in or answer B.
I think its an issue with the question's wording. Does the question want us to place Rachel first, then place J without placing N and T? If that's the case shouldn't it be more explicit?