Q5

 
Nina
Thanks Received: 0
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 103
Joined: October 15th, 2012
 
 
 

Q5

by Nina Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:52 pm

I eliminate B because of the wording "unfavorable". Is this equal to "sympathetic litigants"?

Thanks a lot!
User avatar
 
tommywallach
Thanks Received: 468
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 1041
Joined: August 11th, 2009
 
This post thanked 1 time.
 
 

Re: Q5

by tommywallach Sat Nov 24, 2012 10:36 pm

Hey Nina,

That's absolutely right. Keep in mind, this is an inference question (whenever they say "the passage provides the most support for which of the following"), which means you shouldn't expect the correct answer to use ONLY language you've read in the passage. They're going to expect you to translate a bit.

For example, if I say: "I have a car. What can you infer?"

The correct answer might be: "Tommy is in possession of a vehicle used the conveyance of goods and people from place to place."

Notice that it's entirely new words ("conveyance" "possession" "vehicle"), but it means the same thing as a car, for the sake of the LSAT. Thus, you should never be crossing off answers merely because they use a word you haven't read before. Now, if the word represents a CONCEPT that isn't in the passage, that's different, but in this case, you hit the nail on the head.

(A) We have no reason to believe the MOTIVATIONS changed during his tenure. We don't learn much about motivations.

(B) If Marshall attempted to find "sympathetic litigants," it means that he chose not to use people who weren't sympathetic. In this definition, sympathetic means "capable of eliciting sympathy", or "likeable."

(C) The NAACP didn't oppose his methods, though people have questioned them after the fact.

(D) The comparison isn't made between the two courts in terms of experts.

(E) It wasn't the NAACP that extended these methods, but OTHER groups.

Hope that helps!

-t
Tommy Wallach
Manhattan LSAT Instructor
twallach@manhattanprep.com
Image
 
典张120
Thanks Received: 0
Vinny Gambini
Vinny Gambini
 
Posts: 3
Joined: March 17th, 2019
 
 
 

Re: Q5

by 典张120 Thu Aug 01, 2019 12:04 pm

I just cannot understand B. The passage mentioned that Marshall tended to selecte the sympathetic litigants. But B says that he didn't like the people who were impressive to public??
User avatar
 
ohthatpatrick
Thanks Received: 3808
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 4661
Joined: April 01st, 2011
 
 
 

Re: Q5

by ohthatpatrick Thu Aug 01, 2019 12:35 pm

"making an impression" ≠ "being impressive"

You can make a negative impression, a positive impression, a confusing impression, etc.

If you make an "unfavorable impression", that would mean that people get a bad vibe from you.
(B) is saying that Marshall eschewed taking cases when the plaintiff would have probably given most people a bad vibe.

This is the "logic-shadow" of the passage saying that "he specifically took on cases with sympathetic cases".
If I made a concerted effort to pick shiny apples, then we can infer that I probably turned down some dusty apples along the way.